I don't think we can afford to get the wiring fixed right now. It would involve a huge task, in any case- moving tons of crap out of the way, probably aggravating my wonky vertebrae in the process. Rats! First my neck starts falling apart, then the house. What next? And speaking of rats, I wonder if a rat chewed through a wire? I'm just hoping there isn't something hanging loose inside the wall that's going to start a fire. Also, I hope the outlet with this computer plugged into it doesn't fail. I'm in no shape for undertaking any sort of major project.
Future's So Bleak I Gotta Wear Schadenfreudes
Thousands of users have signed the 2006 Petition Against Changes in the LiveJournal Interface (oh, it needs proofreading so badly!) Apparently, the recent plans by lj_design have not been popular. I'm wondering how popular 6A's new Vox platform is going to be? As far as I know, nothing owned by 6A except LJ has ever yet operated in the black. Nevertheless, they are launching a new service which will compete directly with LJ- friends pages are called "neighborhoods" and the look is different (a bit cheesier, to my eye), but it's essentially a slightly different version of LJ. I think I'm getting a whiff of sulphur off of the pages.
There are lot of discussions (this one at permmembers, for example) about 6A's reasons for launching Vox- mostly having to do with a presumed desire on the company's part to shift older users over to the new service and turn LJ into a kiddie playground like MySpace, but something is being overlooked in most of the discussions I've seen. LJ code is (or much of it is- most of that portion of it which was developed up until the time 6A took over) open source. Vox code is proprietary. If improvements to LJ are throttled back, and the work that would have gone into improving LJ goes instead into improving the proprietary code of Vox, then 6A gains in value.
I suspect that this is the real motivation behind Vox. The venture capitalists to which 6A is beholden don't want their money going to anything open source, so the company is taking the gamble that they'll be able to replicate LJ's earlier success with a near-clone that is based entirely on proprietary software. This could turn out to be a flabbergastingly stupid business decision- or it might actually work. After all, a monkey did once fly out of somebody's butt, didn't it?
Personally, I now wouldn't be surprised to see the whole company crash and burn. This launch is going to be costly. LJ is no longer growing rapidly, but it has a vastly increased paid staff, so it's no longer the cash cow it once was. 6A could burn through their venture capital pretty fast. More might be forthcoming, but how much more influence will the VC firms gain over the company if that happens? What would that mean for LJ? I doubt that anybody at 6A would be able to answer these questions, even if they wanted to. I think they're making it up as they go along. Desperation and sulphur smell a lot alike sometimes.