rejectomorph (flying_blind) wrote,
rejectomorph
flying_blind

Yay?

Tuesday I managed to disappoint myself again by not getting to Safeway. Had I been a little bit faster, or gotten up just a few minutes earlier, I might have made it, but I overslept and then let myself be unfocused. I still might have made it had one or the other of the buses that go to one or the other of the Safeways been late, but they were on time so I missed both. It's all their fault for having been unexpectedly competent today, except insofar as it's my fault for not having gotten my act together, which means it was entirely my fault.

Maybe it was being disappointed in myself that made me so sleepy this evening, though having overslept enough to miss the bus but not enough to have actually had enough sleep to get my sorry ass focused might have played a role. Anyway, around seven in the evening I couldn't keep my eyes open, and rather than risk falling of the chair and cracking my head open on the hard floor and lying there for days before my rotting corpse was discovered, I decided to lie down on the bed for a while, and ended up sleeping until almost midnight. On the bright side, my skull is not cracked and there are, at least for now, no cadavers in the apartment, not even mine. That's a good thing, since it increases the chances that I or my heirs will ultimately get at least part of my security deposit back.

But after missing the last possible bus to Safeway and before taking that long, fitful nap, I rewarded myself for my incompetence by going to the Goodwill store where I found no fewer than five books, four of them quite large and three of those consisting mostly of pictures. Since I can look at pictures much faster than I can read, I consider picture books a much less wasteful purchase than books I will never get around to reading before I become the cadaver that will ruin my heirs' chances of getting much of my security deposit back. Of the three art-filled picture books, two are published by Thames and Hudson, London, and are called Medieval Panorama and The Panorama of the Renaissance. The third has a similar title, Panorama of the Enlightenment, but is published by the Getty Center. All three are quite lavish, an in very good condition.

The other large book is a library discard, though which library discarded it has been effectively concealed, yet is in remarkably good condition, so I doubt it was even thumbed through by more than a handful of people. It's part of the Facts on File Library of American History series, The Roaring Twenties, and though it is very text-heavy it nonetheless has quite a few black and white photos, many of which I've never seen before. It's an era that has long fascinated me, so many of its artifacts having still been present when I was growing up, and watching it slowly fade has been a background motif of my entire life. One of the thoughts that periodically comes to make me sad is that even the youngest of the flappers are probably all dead by now. R.I.P., Zelda.

The last book is a large paperback that somewhat surprised me. It's called The Most Typical Avant-Garde, and is subtitled History and Geography of Minor Cinemas in Los Angeles. Author David E. James is a professor in the School of Cinema and Television at USC, and the book is published by the University of California Press. It's one of those dense academic books which probably exists only because of the publish-or-perish system, and its subject is remarkably obscure, yet I'm surprised I've never heard of it since I have done quite a bit of research in that remarkably obscure subject (cinema theaters in Los Angeles) myself. I think I'll enjoy poking around in it to see if professor James knows much about it that I don't. The copyright page of the book indicates that the professor and I are about the same age, but the Internet indicates that he has accomplished somewhat more than I have. I wonder if I ever almost encountered him in one of those movie theaters we've both written about?

Ah, another reason for me to be disappointed in myself. Just what I needed. Given how messed up my sleep schedule is now it seems unlikely I'll get anything done tomorrow today, but maybe I can get my act together enough to do something by Friday. That would not be especially disappointing. Then if I die on Saturday I will leave a more accomplished cadaver to rot undiscovered here for days on end.

Did anybody notice that I'm not very cheerful tonight, but still have something resembling a sense of humor? Yay me?
Subscribe

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • 51/62: Guess I'll Eat Some

    This whole sleeping at night thing does not seem to be working out well for me. I feel downright juvenile, except for the falling into decrepitude…

  • 51/61: Bad Luck With Leaves

    The Sunday dinner I was going to have for Monday lunch lingered a bit longer, and I just had it for Tuesday breakfast. I also had a bottle of…

  • 51/60: Flood Me Not

    Sunday night I think I was in bed longer than I've been in years. I didn't sleep the entire time, of course, but even when my brain hopped into the…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment